Main issue made by Braydon: I7 Processor or I5 Processor ?
I am planning on building a computer. I was wondering if it would be better to have an I5 3570K 3.4Ghz quad core with a GTX 680, or a I7 3770k 3.5Ghz with a GTX 670. I am mostly going to be using it for gaming.
This may be everything about I7 Processor or I5 Processor ? that you might might want to solve conditions on their very own. Simply it will aid in lots of ways, as well as yourself greater. Needing everything about I7 Processor or I5 Processor ? may possibly be a strategy in to the future.
Optimum solution:
Answer by John Smith
The quad-core I-5 is a great chip. I bought one. It is not tip-top of the line though and I cannot run the latest games at tip-top graphics settings. It will run older games just great though, I run “Microsoft Flight Simulator X” cranked all the way up and it runs smooth as glass. Running “World of Tanks” though, I have to remove some of the graphics effects to get a smooth running experience.
Think about the next 2 or three years. If you don’t want to have to upgrade and you want to run the newest games at full-crankage, you should get a good, quad-core I-7.
Answer by It’s not magic, it’s physics!
For gaming, you won’t be able to notice a difference in performance between an i5 3570K and an i7 3770K. The primary difference between the two is that the i7 does hyper-threading, or the ability for one processor core to simultaneously handle 2 tasks by exploiting gaps in resource usage, whereas the i5 does not. Games don’t utilize hyper-threading, so any difference there is nullified.
Another difference is the clock speed (3.4GHz vs. 3.5GHz) — but that clock speed difference doesn’t matter for unlocked processors because you’re going to overclock the thing. If you’re buying an unlocked processor and you don’t overclock it then that’s a waste of money – a waste of the price difference between an i5 3570 and an i5 3570K. The only note I would make about overclocking the processor is that the chips are the same silicon, but they are cherry picked as i5′s or i7′s based on performance limits under test, and i7′s are cherry picked as faster and/or lower power leakage, so on average the i7 will likely overclock better than the i5 (likely, but I won’t make anything close to a guarantee on that).
The biggest difference in gaming will come from your graphics card, so getting the GTX 680 instead of a 670 will make a bigger positive difference than getting an i7 instead of an i5.
Answer by LookatMe
As repeated many times
Gaming performance is mainly influenced by your GPU as long as your CPU is passable. (ie. modern)
But heres the vague idea with the Sandies/ivys:
i3s are pretty much for general gaming (ie, RPGs, simulations), web surfing, and amature home video encoding/photo editing (ie. family videos).
i5s are for “enthusiast” gaming (ie. FPS, RTS, the “big titles” ), and semi-professional video encoding/editing.
i7s are for “professionals” or high end gaming can say that run VMs, do serious video/photo editing and/or run professional applications like AutoCAD/Solidworks, etc.
Longetivity-wise, expect things to drop a rank every ~1.5-2 years. (i7 “becomes” i5, i5 “becomes” i3, etc.)
Power/heat wise, with the exception of the i3, which would use a fair bit (~30W) less power as it is a dual core, the i5/i7s are fairly identical. However, being in the same family, I doubt you will notice much of a difference between an i7 and an i3 in terms of noise and power bills.
The i5 is generally better than the i7 for games because it is cheaper; both are quad core CPUs. Additionally, the i7 has Hyper Threading (HT) which isn’t used in games. Lots of 3D rendering programs and video editing and encoding programs can have HT capabilities, but you must check if the software you are gonna use will make use of HT.
The i3 is a good CPU for gaming on a budget; it can beat a quad Phenom II 955 BE. Many games are capable of using two cores. Actually, a good amount of games can make use of 3 cores. Games capable of using 4 cores have started to arrive.
But my vote goes to the i5 3570k as it represents the best balance of performance and price. Being a quad core CPU, it is more capable than the i3 with heavily multi-threaded programs. It is less expensive than the i7 because of the lack of HT which may or may not be useful depending on the programs being or will be used.
Its all very vague though, and will vary greatly depending on your specific situation
One more thing if you are on budget and want awesome performance then you may also go for amd fx processor specially fx 8350 vishera. though its single core performance is not that good but its nice alternative to intel i5 3570k and being cheaper you can invest the same surplus into a good gpu to get same or equal or even more than the i5.
In the end I would say that a lot depends on your particular situation . I am using an fx 8350 and believe me its a beast. Intel may be better at gaming but believe me amd can be as just reliable.
Answer by W4bark
I’m useing a i5-3550 and a HDMI..connection../
With excellent results..better than DV-I
Personally–I think the i7 is over kill..
The i7 is what I would use–if I was a corporate executive.
Do know a lot better?
Add your ultimate answer while in the comments!
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/rxfC http://booredatwork.com/2012/12/08/intel-ivy-bridge-with-core-i7-3770k-qz77ga-70k-system-build/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/bo…
I7 processor or I5 processor?
No comments:
Post a Comment